Now Accepting Reservations: Coulomb Charging Stations

For a typical gasoline engine, filling up at a gas station takes about 5 minutes. If a gas station has 6 pumps, that’s a capacity of 72 fill-ups per hour, but to be conservative, let’s call it 50.  Gas stations rarely have much in the way of lines, so capacity seems to be sufficient.

How does that compare to an EV charging scenario?  Let’s assume a coffee shop adds 3 Level-2 chargers to its parking lot to be used by customers to top off while sipping a cup of joe. If we assume an average customer uses a charger for 30 minutes, then the coffee shop’s capacity is a mere 6 charging-customers per hour.  That’s 50 versus 6 in our gas stations versus coffee shop comparison.  And the difference is actually greater when looking at regional capacity as there will be multiple gas stations in a typical urban or suburban area, but, at least for now, that coffee shop might be the only local option.  All this means that an under-supply of charging stations is inevitable, and customers will either have to wait in line or gamble on whether a station will be available.

Well, the folks at Coulomb seem to agree with me because they just launched a reservation system for their ChargePoint Network. Now a customer in my Starbucks scenario could guarantee themselves a charging station by reserving time online or via a smartphone app.  As Coulomb puts it, “If you are certain you can charge at your destination, it effectively doubles the range of your vehicle.”  And I would say that halves your range anxiety.  Well done, Coulomb.

Share

Nissan Leaf Delivery Now July

When I first made my reservation almost a year ago, early deliveries where potentially in late 2010. Then that got pushed into early 2011. And now, understandably in light of the earthquake, my scheduled delivery is for July. On the bright side, a few more delays and I’ll be able to get a Tesla Model S instead!

Share

Range and Charge Time: Two Elephants in the Room

I’m a big fan of technology. An early adopter. So my interest in electric vehicles is hardly indicative of their mass market potential or whether the EV industry will overcome its huge hurdles to sales success. And not just one hurdle, but two: range and charge time. Why do I separate them? Well, if an EV’s range were short, but charging fast (say 5 minutes), then no problem. Or if an EV’s range were long (say 300 miles), but charging slow, again, fine. But most upcoming EVs suffer from both short range and slow charging, a potentially fatal combination from a sales perspective. EVs may provide a great ride, but without solving these two problems, they will remain a niche product.

For example, a Nissan Leaf has a range of roughly 100 miles and requires about 8 hours of charging (with a Level 2 charger – we’ll get into that later). That’s fine for the average commute, but what happens if you live in San Francisco and have a meeting in San Jose with a round trip of 94 miles? Are EVs destined to be merely second or third cars for a few drivers?

Range distance cannot be easily extended, at least in purely electric vehicles. Battery capacity or efficiency has only been improving slowly over the course of years and still cannot be counted on as short-term improvement. Adding more batteries to EVs isn’t feasible as they are very expensive (for example, a Tesla has a 300-mile range but costs over $100,000). Battery-swapping arrangements — imagine pulling up to a swapping station and quickly exchanging dead batteries for fresh ones — may never become viable. That leaves plug-in hybrids as the leading compromise solution, with extended range achieved by adding the complexity of a gas engine. Hybrids are fine at this point and obviously quite marketable, but the industry clearly hopes to achieve market success with 100% electrics.

Lacking good solutions for electric range, the EV industry is instead focused on improving charge time and charging convenience. This approach is receiving massive attention from the private and public sectors, which are working together to launch subsidized networks of high-voltage charging stations. First, a primer on charging times, equipment costs and terminology, again using the Nissan Leaf as an example:

  • Level 1: A regular 120-volt home plug. No special equipment. Charge time of 22 hours.
  • Level 2: 240 volts, similar to that used by an electric clothes drier. Charge time of 8 hours. $2,000 to $3,000 for charger and installation
  • Level 3: 480 volts, direct-current. Charge time of only 30 minutes. $15,000+ for charger.

Level 1 charging is easy but nearly worthless for any sort of regular-use vehicle. Level 3 is great but cost prohibitive. Will Level 2 chargers hit the sweet spot? They’re fast enough to charge an EV overnight or at work, or to top off while shopping. Are they cheap enough for a massive roll-out to office buildings, shopping malls and home garages? While charging in home garages or even driveways (chargers are waterproof) sounds like the obvious choice, less than 1 in 5 cars in America are parked in a private garage making home charging an unlikely option for the majority of cars parked on residential streets or in apartment building garages. That’s why industry research forecasts that metropolitan areas will need at least 1.5 public chargers (office buildings, shopping malls, etc.) for every one electric vehicle to provide a charging network that can blanket the region geographically as well as become the security blanket that overcomes range anxiety.

The public and private sectors clearly agree and are placing big bets on public networks of Level 2 (and some Level 3) chargers. Private capital has rushed into companies like Coulomb, ECOtality and AeroVironment who manufacture and install chargers. Governments at the federal, state and local levels are doing their part with tax breaks, streamlined permits and major public-private projects. Every month new initiatives are announced by cities (Houston, Phoenix and Seattle come to mind) and companies, from national chains like Best Buy to the surprising move by Cracker Barrel to install Level 3 chargers at its Tennessee restaurants. If EV sales and charging networks present a classic chicken-before-the-egg dilemma, electric vehicle stakeholders are clearly betting big on launching charging networks first, before EVs become mainstream.

Share

Test Drive: Nissan Leaf Will Move You

This afternoon Nissan held a Leaf test drive event in San Jose, their first event in the Bay Area (a San Francisco event is next month). I brought the whole family to take a spin.

Despite the rain and a Giants World Series game, the place was packed. A Nissan staff member told me they typically overbook these events in anticipation of no-shows, but not this crowd — 800+ reservations showed up plus more walk-ins. People were waiting in line up to 2 hours just for a 5-minute test drive, which was more Disneyland ride than real test drive — register, wrist band, long line, staging area to load up into one of about 10 cars, followed by quick drive around some quiet downtown San Jose streets.

But it served its purpose. My wife and 4-year-old daughter loved the Leaf — “smooth and quiet.” And I wasn’t surprised. A gas vehicle, with its internal combustion and gear shifting, can’t really compete with the single-gear purring of an electric motor. I was pleased with the Leaf’s driving performance. While the Leaf is not designed to be a sports car (try a Tesla for that), EVs have an on/off sensation that makes accelerating from a standstill fun. In comparison to a gas engine, which has little power when you first step on the gas at low RPM, an electric motor provides 100% of its oomph (torque) at zero RPM. Sort of like turning on a light switch. The result: Flooring it will chirp the tires pulling out of a red light. Once home, I dug up some data to back up my sensation. 0-60 times, in seconds:

There you go. The Leaf beats various hybrid and gas benchmarks and is almost as fast as a BMW 328i, a more-than-fair comparison.

Handling felt nimble, although to be fair I need a little more driving time, including freeway and hills (Popular Science has a great complete review). The regenerative breaking effect is modest (and has low and high settings), much like a Prius. And we packed in 5 comfortably. I think the low operating costs and practical hatchback design will likely make the Leaf an owner’s primary vehicle for commuting, errands and short weekend trips. Which means the only hurdle, and it’s a big one, to sales success is driving range and charging, but I’ll leave that discussion for another post.

Bottom line: My family wants a Leaf!

Share

In-home Charger Assessment

Today I had my assessment for installing an in-home charger. About a 20 minute process performed by a friendly local electrician under contract by Nissan and AeroVironment (Nissan’s preferred manufacturer of chargers). He said he just completed his first charger installation earlier this week. My house has a garage with an electric breaker box, so the installation should be fairly routine, and the installation company handles required city permits and inspection approvals. I’ll receive a cost estimate shortly.

In a 2-car garage the most critical decision might be on which side to install the charger. Except the charger will come with a 15 foot cable (20 foot optional), maintaining flexibility.

Share

Porsche’s Three Hybrids

In case anyone has underestimated the level of complexity and innovation within the EV industry, the NY Times writes about three radically different hybrids being simultaneously developed by Porsche, a brand near-and-dear to my heart (I own an old 911). The differences among the three are startling and definitely a sign of things to come.

First, the Cayenne Hybrid, an SUV with a gas V6 and an electric motor that can work together (in parallel) with the gas engine or, surprisingly, alone in pure electric mode. While not a plug-in, nice to see electric-only mode being introduced to this class of vehicle.

Second, the 918 Spyder supercar prototype, which has a V8 gas engine plus two electric motors, one for the front wheels and one for the back, with plug-in charging capacity. 3.2 seconds to 60, and 78 miles per gallon? Well yes, but not all at the same time, and achieving 78 mpg will surely require a decidedly non-Porsche driving style.

Lastly, Porsche rocked the racing world with the GT3R Hybrid that almost won the 24 hours of Nurburgring last May.  This 911 derivative is propelled by a traditional flat-six gas engine driving the rear wheels plus two electric motors driving each of the front wheels. The clever trick here is that the electric power is delivered not by batteries, but by a flywheel sitting in the passenger’s seat (or at least where a passenger seat would be in a normal car). The flywheel stores kinetic energy during braking that is released like a bolt of lightening at the touch of a button (perhaps just after a corner’s apex when looking to pass a pesky Ferrari). No, we’re not going to see 40,000 RPM flywheels in consumer cars anytime soon, but bless Porsche for fearlessly diving into EV technology in such a high-profile manner.

What’s next for Porsche? Reports of electric Boxsters and hybrid Panameras. Tesla was first to make EVs sexy, but looks like Porsche will be first to mass market electric sports cars.

Share